Asterpath · Revision 4
Supporting evidence
Give the first task a clear visual priority.
Four equally prominent workspace actions compete for attention in the illustrated design.
Fictional, not a scanner result. FICTIONAL ILLUSTRATIVE SAMPLE. Asterpath, its product, evidence, findings and measurements are invented. No Asterpath application was inspected and no scanner was executed. These are original GadirLabs illustrations, not native vendor exports.
What the fictional evidence shows
| Observation | Illustrative assessment | Boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Action emphasis | Create, templates, upgrade and import all use filled button treatment. | Expert inspection, not an observed conversion loss. |
| Proposed direction | Emphasise the first-use task and group secondary actions by purpose. | Keep the intended expressive palette and all relevant actions available. |
| Validation | Review hierarchy, then check comprehension with representative users when available. | No representative-user study was conducted. |
What it means
F04 is Low severity because the actions remain available and the impact is a judgement about clarity. There is no rule that every screen must have exactly one button.
What would establish a fix
Make the intended first action recognisable while preserving useful alternatives, coherent colour roles and the product's identity.
This page and its JSON are two views of the same original illustration. They are not separate findings or independent corroboration. A real client record would identify actual versions, inputs, outputs and evidence limits.