Asterpath · Revision 4
Supporting evidence
Reconcile provider cost with successful customer work.
The same invented billing period contains £351 in the product ledger and £428 in the provider invoice.
Fictional, not a scanner result. FICTIONAL ILLUSTRATIVE SAMPLE. Asterpath, its product, evidence, findings and measurements are invented. No Asterpath application was inspected and no scanner was executed. These are original GadirLabs illustrations, not native vendor exports.
What the fictional evidence shows
Common scale: £0–£450. £77 remains unattributed.
| Measure | Illustrative value | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Aligned period | 30 days | The ledger and invoice cover the same invented period. |
| Product ledger | £351 | Incomplete attribution of attempts. |
| Provider invoice | £428 | Represents all provider billing in the fiction. |
| Unattributed gap | £77 · 18.0% of invoice | Not allocated to invented subcategories. |
| Successful plans | 10,912 | Cost per success must include failed/retried work. |
| Cost per success | £0.032 ledger / £0.039 invoice | Rounded to three decimal places. |
What it means
The £77 difference is left visibly unattributed. We do not invent amounts for retries, failures or telemetry loss to force reconciliation.
What would establish a fix
Capture every provider attempt and outcome, preserve unknown prices as unknown, and classify all remaining variance with an owner in a new aligned period.
This page and its JSON are two views of the same original illustration. They are not separate findings or independent corroboration. A real client record would identify actual versions, inputs, outputs and evidence limits.